Re: All your links are belong to us.

Nick · by Nick on Fri Feb 27, 2009 6:41 pm

Jeez Andy, some of the durge you conjour up from the internet...

Nick · by Nick on Fri Feb 27, 2009 6:42 pm

You are turning in to Database Andy.

Andrew.C · by Andrew.C on Fri Feb 27, 2009 7:26 pm

Oh, shutup, you! Now there's no way you're making it into the Super Friends...

Nick · by Nick on Fri Feb 27, 2009 10:38 pm

SOISOISOISOISOISOISOISOISOI

Glenjamin · by Glenjamin on Mon Mar 02, 2009 10:47 am

I still don't get it...

Andrew.C · by Andrew.C on Mon Mar 02, 2009 11:29 am

You will be called 'Cosmos.'

Nick · by Nick on Mon Mar 02, 2009 12:47 pm

Arr, no thanks!

Andrew.C · by Andrew.C on Mon Mar 02, 2009 1:14 pm

Haha. I love how he takes one bite of his sandwhich, then "Well, I'm done."

Glenjamin · by Glenjamin on Mon Mar 02, 2009 1:43 pm

Is it me- or does bart look terrified? (having not seen the episode)

Andrew.C · by Andrew.C on Mon Mar 02, 2009 2:29 pm

C'mon, it's the comet episode! You sure you haven't seen it?

Nick · by Nick on Tue Mar 03, 2009 12:59 pm

It's one of the good ones Glen!

Glenjamin · by Glenjamin on Tue Mar 03, 2009 9:05 pm

I gave up on the Simpsons a long time ago- between channel 10 only playing the first 6 seasons in the evening and the "new" episodes at inconvenient times i just gave up...

Andrew.C · by Andrew.C on Tue Mar 03, 2009 10:34 pm

You gave up on The Simpsons? Why not give up on those crappy free-to-air networks? C'mon Glen, don't blame The Simpsons they're still cool. Noooo!

Nick · by Nick on Wed Mar 04, 2009 9:16 am

I do HATE ten. They way they cut of some of the jokes so that can get more commercial time in.

Madness!

Andrew.C · by Andrew.C on Thu Mar 05, 2009 11:48 am

http://www.allmilitary.com/candidate_calculator.html

"Pretend you're working and play with this

A friend sent along this link that's been so much fun to toy with that productivity has lagged a bit (unless, of course, you're a supervising editor reading this, in which case we spent only two minutes and 11 seconds on the site. During lunch. While writing another blog item with the left hand).

The premise is you answer "yes," "no" or "unsure" on 23 questions, rank the individual question's importance to you -- low, medium or high -- and the tabulator tells you which presidential candidate is the best match. Kind of like eHarmony for uncertain voters.

If you leave the intensity setting at "medium" and click "yes" for all the issues -- from supporting gay marriage to supporting the Iraq war and school vouchers -- your candidate is Rudy Giuliani. If you click "no" for all the issues, you get Ron Paul. If you click "unsure," Joe Biden's your best bet.

This is where it gets fun. Just start clicking willy-nilly. We alternated "yes" and "no" down the list and got businessman John Cox. Who, you say? Then we reversed, "no" and "yes" down the list and got Mike Gravel. If the only issue you're sure of -- and you rate it high -- is drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, then Sam Brownback's your man.

Go ahead. Play with it. We'll watch for the hall monitor.

-- Scott Martelle"
http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/washington/2007/09/pretend-youre-w.html

Sure, the election's already over, but meh... kinda interesting. I got Obama at top, what'ya know.