Latest topics
» "Churnalism" Ha! What a great word.
Sun Sep 27, 2009 9:40 pm by Groove Champion

» Random Task
Tue Jul 28, 2009 5:18 pm by Andrew.C

» I dunno. Drug Lab?
Tue Jun 30, 2009 9:49 pm by Andrew.C

» All your links are belong to us.
Tue Jun 30, 2009 9:40 pm by Andrew.C

» Now that's a headline
Wed Jun 24, 2009 8:51 pm by Andrew.C

» Yay, 1 more day till LHC (end of the world)!!!
Wed Jun 24, 2009 8:48 pm by Andrew.C

» video Links
Mon Jun 08, 2009 12:28 am by Andrew.C

» The Dark Ages ended?
Wed May 27, 2009 2:03 pm by Andrew.C

» Bus campaign.
Wed May 27, 2009 1:53 pm by Andrew.C

Poll

So, how many people still visit the forum?

100% 100% [ 5 ]
0% 0% [ 0 ]

Total Votes : 5

SA ban on Junk Food Ads

Post new topic   Reply to topic

Page 3 of 3 Previous  1, 2, 3

View previous topic View next topic Go down

Re: SA ban on Junk Food Ads

Post by Tom on Wed Sep 17, 2008 9:18 am

am i the only one that sees this as a chance to see if darwinism actually works?

Tom
Queen of France

Male
Number of posts: 409
Age: 25
Humor: Sardonic
Registration date: 2008-02-27

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: SA ban on Junk Food Ads

Post by Andrew.C on Wed Sep 17, 2008 12:59 pm

Tom. That's a bad Tom. I retract my nomination for you as Prime Minister (Isn't that how Hitler started?)

Also, we already know that Darwinism works. No testing!

_________________
George: Was I talking to you, Pin-head!?

Andrew.C
Larry David In Training
Larry David In Training

Number of posts: 1611
Registration date: 2008-02-21

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: SA ban on Junk Food Ads

Post by Nick on Wed Sep 17, 2008 12:59 pm

no

_________________
Goodnight Springton... there will be no encore!

Nick
Super-Corrupt Supreme Overload/Extreme-Executive Producer
Super-Corrupt Supreme Overload/Extreme-Executive Producer

Male
Number of posts: 683
Age: 24
Location: Sydney, Australia
Registration date: 2008-02-21

View user profile http://nocrevushere.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

Re: SA ban on Junk Food Ads

Post by Andrew.C on Wed Sep 17, 2008 1:06 pm

no? no what? You better start making more sense otherwise we'll stick you in a home!

_________________
George: Was I talking to you, Pin-head!?

Andrew.C
Larry David In Training
Larry David In Training

Number of posts: 1611
Registration date: 2008-02-21

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: SA ban on Junk Food Ads

Post by Groove Champion on Wed Sep 17, 2008 8:48 pm

At least he spelt it correctly.
Pirate

_________________
the hammer is my penis

Groove Champion
I think it's a video game.

Male
Number of posts: 329
Age: 27
Registration date: 2008-03-05

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: SA ban on Junk Food Ads

Post by Nick on Wed Sep 17, 2008 11:20 pm

Tom wrote:am i the only one that sees this as a chance to see if darwinism actually works?


no to this

_________________
Goodnight Springton... there will be no encore!

Nick
Super-Corrupt Supreme Overload/Extreme-Executive Producer
Super-Corrupt Supreme Overload/Extreme-Executive Producer

Male
Number of posts: 683
Age: 24
Location: Sydney, Australia
Registration date: 2008-02-21

View user profile http://nocrevushere.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

Re: SA ban on Junk Food Ads

Post by Andrew.C on Thu Sep 18, 2008 10:51 am

Oh, I see. I didn't realise that we posted at the same time but mine just happened to come up first.

_________________
George: Was I talking to you, Pin-head!?

Andrew.C
Larry David In Training
Larry David In Training

Number of posts: 1611
Registration date: 2008-02-21

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: SA ban on Junk Food Ads

Post by Andrew.C on Sat Jan 24, 2009 5:51 pm

Hey, Senator - leave us discerning viewers of pornography alone

Article wrote:In case you hadn't heard, Senator Stephen Conroy, the Communications Minister, will soon serve Australians a smut-free internet. Or, at the very least, he'll soon supervise the audition for his sanitised feed. Late last year he announced it on his now-defunct blog. Any day now, some of Australia's internet service providers - the companies you pay for your web access - will join in a pilot of the minister's filter.


I may have misunderstood the article, but is he saying that some ISP will soon be filtering out porn? Get out of town.

Does that mean we only get a couple more sweet porny days? Then the government takes it away again?
That means, load up!

_________________
George: Was I talking to you, Pin-head!?

Andrew.C
Larry David In Training
Larry David In Training

Number of posts: 1611
Registration date: 2008-02-21

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: SA ban on Junk Food Ads

Post by Marc on Sun Jan 25, 2009 1:15 pm

These are probably the same people who freak out when somebody swears or makes a sexual reference in a videogame that's full of severed limbs and exploding heads.

_________________
If you have a mouthful of very hot soup, the next thing you do will be wrong.

Marc
Nobody Deserves This More Than You

Male
Number of posts: 732
Age: 24
Location: Sydney, Australia
Registration date: 2008-02-21

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: SA ban on Junk Food Ads

Post by Andrew.C on Sun Jan 25, 2009 5:02 pm

Yeah, and somehow they've gotten power??

But c'mon, Marc, that's severed limbs, exploding heads, and gratuitous excessive cruelty - those things are only minor violations when compared to things like swearing and consensual sex.

_________________
George: Was I talking to you, Pin-head!?

Andrew.C
Larry David In Training
Larry David In Training

Number of posts: 1611
Registration date: 2008-02-21

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: SA ban on Junk Food Ads

Post by Nick on Sun Jan 25, 2009 6:25 pm

I don't like the idea of these filters, at all.

_________________
Goodnight Springton... there will be no encore!

Nick
Super-Corrupt Supreme Overload/Extreme-Executive Producer
Super-Corrupt Supreme Overload/Extreme-Executive Producer

Male
Number of posts: 683
Age: 24
Location: Sydney, Australia
Registration date: 2008-02-21

View user profile http://nocrevushere.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

Re: SA ban on Junk Food Ads

Post by Andrew.C on Thu Mar 19, 2009 9:57 pm

http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2009/03/19/1237054961100.html

Article wrote:The Australian communications regulator's top-secret blacklist of banned websites has been leaked on to the web and paints a harrowing picture of Australia's forthcoming internet censorship regime.

[...]

about half of the sites on the list are not related to child porn and include a slew of online poker sites, YouTube links, regular gay and straight porn sites, Wikipedia entries, euthanasia sites, websites of fringe religions such as satanic sites, fetish sites, Christian sites, the website of a tour operator and even a Queensland dentist.

"It seems to me as if just about anything can potentially get on the list," Landfelt said.

At least it says this:

Article wrote:The blacklist is maintained by ACMA and provided to makers of internet filtering software that parents can opt to install on their PCs.

But then it says this!

Article wrote:However, if the Government proceeds with its mandatory internet filtering scheme, sites on the blacklist will be blocked for all Australians. The Government has flagged plans to expand the blacklist to 10,000 sites or more.

And here’s another related article
http://www.smh.com.au/news/home/technology/banned-hyperlinks-could-cost-you-11000-a-day/2009/03/17/1237054787635.html?page=2

Article wrote:The Australian communications regulator says it will fine people who hyperlink to sites on its blacklist, which has been further expanded to include several pages on the anonymous whistleblower site Wikileaks [the site that leaked the list].


Article wrote:ACMA's blacklist does not have a significant impact on web browsing by Australians today but sites contained on it will be blocked for everyone if the Federal Government implements its mandatory internet filtering censorship scheme.
But even without the mandatory censorship scheme, as is evident in the Whirlpool case, ACMA can force sites hosted in Australia to remove "prohibited" pages and even links to prohibited pages.

Luckily,

Article wrote:The Greens and Opposition also oppose the scheme, meaning any legislation to implement it will be blocked.

The Opposition has obtained legal advice that "legislation of some sort will almost certainly be required"

But...

Article wrote:,but others have said it may be possible to implement the scheme without legislation.

_________________
George: Was I talking to you, Pin-head!?

Andrew.C
Larry David In Training
Larry David In Training

Number of posts: 1611
Registration date: 2008-02-21

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: SA ban on Junk Food Ads

Post by Nick on Thu Mar 19, 2009 10:26 pm

Disdain

_________________
Goodnight Springton... there will be no encore!

Nick
Super-Corrupt Supreme Overload/Extreme-Executive Producer
Super-Corrupt Supreme Overload/Extreme-Executive Producer

Male
Number of posts: 683
Age: 24
Location: Sydney, Australia
Registration date: 2008-02-21

View user profile http://nocrevushere.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

Re: SA ban on Junk Food Ads

Post by Andrew.C on Mon Mar 23, 2009 10:44 pm

http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2009/03/23/1237656833566.html

Article wrote:Australia's third largest internet provider, iiNet, has withdrawn from the Government's internet censorship trials, saying it could not "reconcile participation in the trial with our corporate social responsibility".

Nice work, iiNet.

Article wrote:Far from containing just "illegal material" such as child pornography, the [leaked] list of prohibited websites includes a wealth of legal material such as regular gay and straight porn sites, YouTube links, online poker sites, Wikipedia entries, euthanasia sites and even the sites of a Queensland dentist, a school canteen consultancy and an animal carer.

Some of these government guys are just stupid. I'll be glad when this fails abysmally, which it hopefully will.

_________________
George: Was I talking to you, Pin-head!?

Andrew.C
Larry David In Training
Larry David In Training

Number of posts: 1611
Registration date: 2008-02-21

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: SA ban on Junk Food Ads

Post by Glenjamin on Fri Mar 27, 2009 7:35 am

As much as i don't like porn, this seems like a huge waste of Govt. time/money/effort- why not attack a feasible issue (like poverty)?

_________________
Why? Because Mentok wills it!

Glenjamin
He's A Regular Charlie Church

Number of posts: 772
Registration date: 2008-02-22

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Page 3 of 3 Previous  1, 2, 3

View previous topic View next topic Back to top


Post new topic   Reply to topic
Permissions of this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum