Re: The Contrabulous Fabtraption of Professor Horatio Hufnagel (and other movies)

by Glenjamin Wed Jul 23, 2008 4:18 am

i dun no... maybe they has not enuf monies?

or perhaps they r taking a 70 year old concept and attempting to appeal to every facet of the fan base- modernizing what they can get away with and being traditional where they want to be. I kinda like that they try to do both.

by Nick Wed Jul 23, 2008 4:24 am

I havn't seen it, I would like to view the fiLm.

by MRac MC Wed Jul 23, 2008 4:25 am

Probably they're pandering because they know that fanboys will seriously flip out if too much is changed. Still, they have to explain Batman's gadgetry somehow, I suppose.

Spoiler:

by Nick Wed Jul 23, 2008 4:26 am

Well I think they would lose easy money if they upset the hardcore comic fans

by Glenjamin Wed Jul 23, 2008 4:37 am

What was that spoiler Marc?

by Nick Wed Jul 23, 2008 4:41 am

Click on the white area around the word spoiler

by MRac MC Wed Jul 23, 2008 4:41 am

But only if you want it spoilt...

by Glenjamin Wed Jul 23, 2008 4:42 am

Oh, i get it- thanks... but i wont be pressing the button.

by Nick Wed Jul 23, 2008 4:43 am

He clearly dose, I mean he asked and all.

by Andrew.C Wed Jul 23, 2008 4:43 am

Glenjamin wrote:i think Morgan portrayed really well, btw

I definitely agree that Freeman is the man. I just wish he didn't have all these cruddy roles. Like that new movie with Jolie in it... poor Morgan.

by Andrew.C Wed Jul 23, 2008 4:46 am

Yeah... why would you ask what the spoiler is, if you don't want to know?? Seriously, did you think you had found away around logic? You christians are always the same...

by Nick Wed Jul 23, 2008 4:46 am

Easy now

by MRac MC Wed Jul 23, 2008 4:46 am

That's the point of the spoiler thing, Glenji...only click it if you've seen it or if you don't care. It's a very minor spoiler though.

It's not like anyone's forcing him to do shit movies. He's always done tons of shit movies and the odd Shawshank.

by Nick Wed Jul 23, 2008 4:47 am

Chain reaction *shudder*

by MRac MC Wed Jul 23, 2008 4:47 am

Evan Almighty!

by Nick Wed Jul 23, 2008 4:52 am

by Glenjamin Wed Jul 23, 2008 4:58 am

I liked Bruce almighty- but i didn't get to see Evan almighty... i guess it wuz no goods?

by Andrew.C Wed Jul 23, 2008 5:17 am

Bruce Almighty was only "good" because of Morgan + Carey, and specifically because of this one line from Carey:

"Back to you, Fuckers!"

by MRac MC Wed Jul 23, 2008 5:21 am

Bruce Almighty was aight till he had to learn a fucking lesson. Also, he didn't abuse his powers nearly enough.

Yeah that line was awesome.

by Andrew.C Wed Jul 23, 2008 5:23 am

There was most definitely a gross and distinct lack of the abusing of powers... especially if he had to learn a lesson.

by Kexer Wed Jul 23, 2008 5:52 am

I hate that learning lesson crap. Like Click with Adam Sandler and Christopher Walken.

It was like two different movies with the fun having then the lesson learning it made me sad.

by MRac MC Wed Jul 23, 2008 5:56 am

I haven't seen it for exactly that reason, and it's the reason I was sceptical of Hancock.

by Nick Wed Jul 23, 2008 5:58 am

yeah, I hope they didn't do some crap like that to that film, because the premise of that film was awesome.

by MRac MC Wed Jul 23, 2008 6:00 am

It is nice to see Jason Bateman in a big movie though, I might have to watch it just for that. Besides, Alex said it was aight.

by Nick Wed Jul 23, 2008 6:02 am

well if Alex said it was alright I will give it a go

by Sponsored content